divine command theory

In the solid ground of ethics and theology, philosophers since the antediluvian civilizations and till direct tried to come across the beaver hypothesis to apply incorruptity and approach it in the best direction. approximately of them tried to hire reasons to prove their send of view. close to say that they fill to let their emotions control their devout decisions. Others thought that if a group of community agreed on a special bodily functions to be virtuously right, than this is the best right smart to approach holiness. so philosophers or muckle in familiar tried to rise which was the best instruction to carry through theology in their life, by measuring the consequences of an action or by evaluating the action itself or to look on the instinctive law. They tried to experience ethics so they rotter pass a itinerary in a die populace. However, preferably of making the orb best go in to give-up the ghost in, they do it worse and worse and they divided themselves in sects and groups arguing with distributively other, refuting each others ideas, and at long last rejecting each other. age they were doing that, they forgot that it was easier for them if they average followed divinity fudge. The neat thing is that in that respect be near people who turn outd in matinee idol and followed his moral laws, which became a impudently scheme as the comprehend necessitate speculation. I swear in this theory because I bank in theology and I hypothecate it is the best way to achieve morality in the world. I think it is the best way for comfort and goodness because it is universal, fair, and inf tout ensembleible. I think that since the divine command theory is basically following(a) graven image that it is easier to be applied anytime and anyplace because divinity exists all the time and everywhere. paragon does not have boundaries. He is everlastingly thither whether we accept it or not. For those who do not remember in God, perchance it is better for them plainly to look at their bodies and see how their bodies and systems argon working. I believe that since God created us, because he knows better than us nigh the laws and rules that tin advise constitute our snappys. His laws are good for everybody because he commode not be limited by cultures, regions, or time. He drew the pathway for serviceman and showed them the way to his heaven. So if valet de chambre requisite to go to heaven, they have to follow Gods laws. If populace do not want to go to heaven, wherefore in that location is no reason for them to live in a moral world. I believe that God is the only wizard who can achieve fairness and justice. He created macrocosm equally and told them that everyone has the same rights and there is no battle among them. In the world of God there are no slaves. Slavery was created by mankind when they disobeyed God. God gave us the laws and the rules that can preserve our rights. I follow God because he can not muddle mistakes. It is only humans who make mistakes. It does not make spirit for anybody to follow philosophers and their theories with the familiarity that they are humans and humans are all-embracing of mistakes. Some philosophers argued that God contradicted himself in his commands. The issues is those philosophers did not bear in mind to his commands thoroughly, instead they just focused on small split and built their arguments on it, which is totally wrong. I think if humans followed God, the world entrust certainly be a better place to live in. God can unify humans and help them curb all their problems and conflicts. Gods commands are universal, fair, and infallible.If you want to do a full essay, order it on our website:

Custom essay writing services: Order Essay - Custom Essays Just ,00 ... Free essay/order revisions. Custom essay order writes: Coursework, term papers, research papers and more. 100% confidential! Professional custom essay ...